retractionwatch.com — August 2026 traffic, keywords & AI visibility

Search engines send retractionwatch.com an estimated 6,762 visits a month. Effectively all of it is organic — about 6,762 visits from unpaid results. Spread across 2,367 ranking keywords, that averages roughly 2.9 organic visits per keyword.

retractionwatch.com scores 89 out of 100 on our AI visibility scale, grade A. It takes full marks for LLMS.txt, SEO health and Crawlability. The biggest gap is Company profile, at 19 of 25 points (6/8 core fields), worth 6 points if closed. It also loses points on Structured data (0/5).

The llms.txt on retractionwatch.com runs to 135 lines (6,971 characters) across 12 sections, last generated in May 2026. It introduces the site as "Retraction Watch". It tells AI engines the business works in Research, Science & Deep Tech; Scientific Publishing; and Research Integrity. It describes 3 products, with prices such as Retraction Database at Free, Newsletter at Free and Blog Posts at Free. Services it lists include Data Access, Reporting and Trend Analysis. Technologies it mentions include WordPress and MySQL. The keywords it claims start with "retractions", "scientific integrity", "journal publishing" and "research misconduct".

# Retraction Watch

## About
Retraction Watch follows retractions and corrections across scientific journals to highlight issues in research publishing. The site started as a blog and grew into a key resource for anyone interested in research integrity. It covers cases from high-profile papers to smaller studies that get pulled for various reasons. Readers include scientists, journal editors, and policy makers who want to stay informed about problems in the literature. The team digs into why papers are retracted, whether for errors, misconduct, or other factors. Coverage often includes updates on ongoing investigations and outcomes. Over time the project built a searchable database of retractions that anyone can use. This resource helps researchers avoid citing flawed work and supports better practices in labs and institutions. The focus stays on transparency rather than blame, showing patterns across fields like medicine, biology, and psychology. Stories frequently note how long it takes for retractions to appear after concerns first surface. The site also tracks expressions of concern and corrections that fall short of full retractions. Funding comes from grants and donations that keep the operation independent. Partnerships with academic groups have helped expand the database and improve data quality. Regular posts examine trends such as rising retraction rates in certain co

Google lists retractionwatch.com for about 2,367 keywords, which together bring an estimated 6,762 organic visits a month.

The latest technical audit of retractionwatch.com scored 98 out of 100 overall. All 3 sub-scores are 90 or above. The audit makes 12 recommendations in all, and 3 of the 4 listed first are rated high priority or critical.

Retraction Watch's company profile names pubpeer.com, crossref.org, doaj.org and plos.org as competitors. Its own llms.txt adds biorxiv.org and medrxiv.org. Outside its market, the domains ranked closest to it in our worldwide ranking are media01.eu, bzsggzy.cn, eclipse.dev and eobuwie.com.pl.

pubpeer.com

crossref.org

doaj.org

plos.org

biorxiv.org

medrxiv.org